Research narrative: evidence limits below

After its discussion of Four Eyes, a retained research note records a separate proposal: small objects in a space would return participants’ questions from their own perspectives rather than provide answers. The notes then ask whether people or devices would respond. The research issue is how an experiential aim still needs a response mechanism, operating roles and a form of participation. The evidence remains at the proposal stage. This entry assigns no confirmed title, does not merge the proposal into the plot of Four Eyes and does not claim that the experience was implemented.

Time and version

Based on machine transcription of non-public recordings; not yet checked against the audio and may misrepresent the process. Dates are not independently confirmed.

Anonymous method study; process sequences remain candidates in retained research, not verified personal attributions.

People and organizational roles

This entry adds no attribution of personal or organizational roles.

Limits of this evidence

  • Evidence note: retained research notes and sampled-frame research, without human audio checking. Names, outcomes and exact dates remain unconfirmed; no video time links are generated.
  • The recordings have not been continuously watched or audio-checked here; machine text, sampled frames and retrospective accounts support different kinds of claims.
  • No new personal roles, implementation outcomes or source-to-public-video timing maps are asserted.

These are reviewed research texts. Related public films identify their access editions separately; local source timings are not converted into web links.

People, groups, documents and plans

Solid: documented. Dashed: inference awaiting verification. Double: conflicting evidence. These relationships record public credits, attributed recollections, retained research and explicit links between research entries; no unverified identities or conflict allegations are added. Connections do not imply causation or implementation.

Sources and versions

S58-2 · Notes on post-performance method questions and an object proposal

日期未独立核定 / Date not independently verified

An edited study of ordinary creative methods, based on retained machine notes and sampled-frame research, without human audio verification. The underlying notes, personal judgments, local paths and source timings are not published here.

Passage locator: Criteria, line delivery and an object proposal; private conversation and personal judgments omitted