Research narrative: evidence limits below
The retained machine notes of pre-performance preparation call for a complete run with technical cues following, allowing faster speech so that technical coordination can be checked first. The research distinction is between checking light, music, projection and transitions, and setting the pace of a performance. A separate request to slow the performance may serve a different purpose. A requested complete run is not proof of smooth completion; notes about a remote control and the main light preserve unresolved coordination. The meaning of “first combined run” remains to be clarified.
Time and version
Based on machine transcription of non-public recordings; not yet checked against the audio and may misrepresent the process. Dates are not independently confirmed.
Anonymous method study; process sequences remain candidates in retained research, not verified personal attributions.
People and organizational roles
This entry adds no attribution of personal or organizational roles.
Limits of this evidence
- Evidence note: retained research notes and sampled-frame research, without human audio checking. Names, outcomes and exact dates remain unconfirmed; no video time links are generated.
- The recordings have not been continuously watched or audio-checked here; machine text, sampled frames and retrospective accounts support different kinds of claims.
- No new personal roles, implementation outcomes or source-to-public-video timing maps are asserted.
These are reviewed research texts. Related public films identify their access editions separately; local source timings are not converted into web links.
People, groups, documents and plans
Solid: documented. Dashed: inference awaiting verification. Double: conflicting evidence. These relationships record public credits, attributed recollections, retained research and explicit links between research entries; no unverified identities or conflict allegations are added. Connections do not imply causation or implementation.
- Anonymous method analysis from retained research notesResearch-source relationship; no personal attribution or implementation claim
Sources and versions
S59-1 · Four Eyes: preparation and technical-run notes
日期未独立核定 / Date not independently verified
An edited study of ordinary creative methods, based on retained machine notes and sampled-frame research, without human audio verification. The underlying notes, personal judgments, local paths and source timings are not published here.
Passage locator: Technical-run aims, lighting feedback and the unresolved definition of a combined run