Independent edition · Sources, research and saved versions
中文

Proposal, response and rules

Speaking and deciding within Purple Action

Find the eight-plus-eight proposal, check what the response promises, then open the rule pages. In the first card, distinguish numbers, speaking time and possible voting positions after leaving the candidate group. In the second, compare the promised investigation with the principle of discussion that is retained. In the third, examine rules written as provisions and ballots. The cards organize a comparison of documents, not a timeline of completed reforms. The forum and organizations are fictional settings within the work.

Public article · Chinese

1 From making a case to eight-plus-eight

It turns dissatisfaction into specific numbers, durations and positions that can be compared.

Speaking time, the reply calculating sixteen five-minute statements, the eight-plus-eight proposal and the fiction notice

Read: Forum-style article: speaking time and the eight-plus-eight proposal ↗

Documented details

The forum-style article moves from individual speaking time to a proposal for eight candidates, eight deliberators and possible movement between positions. Replies calculate that sixteen five-minute statements would take eighty minutes and question whether long speeches would turn the encounter into a presentation session.

Public article · Chinese

2 What does the response promise?

It helps distinguish an institutional response and a promise to investigate from an explicit decision to adopt a proposal.

The promise to investigate and adjust, the scope of discussion and the artwork notice

Read: The planning group’s response ↗

Documented details

The fictional planning group promises to investigate problems and adjust the parameters of the Kuijian Council, while opposing an advance restriction of discussion to a particular theoretical form. It does not explicitly adopt eight-plus-eight seats, five-minute statements or voting rights for those leaving the candidate group.

Public PDF · Chinese

3 How rules become a page

It gives procedure a visible form through provisions, rounds, spaces for reasons and pages about circulation.

Page 7: rule design; page 8: ballot collage; page 9: circulation; page 10: deliberation and voting methods

Read: Purple Action: the 24-page project introduction

Documented details

Page 7 of the public 24-page PDF describes rule design and institutions opened to participants. The ballot collage on page 8 shows rounds and spaces for reasons. Pages 9–10 describe circulation, feedback, deliberation and voting models. Read these pages for how procedures are written, recorded and passed on.

Look closely

  • How is the amount of speaking time connected to the position from which someone decides?
  • Which concerns does the response take up, and which position does it retain?
  • What judgments become recordable when a decision is written on a ballot with a round and a space for reasons?

The forum, organizations and role signatures are fictional settings within the artwork. They do not identify real-person disputes or actual harm. Adoption of the proposal is not established, and the ballot collage is not a complete record of any one vote.

When a rule allows speech, does it also shape how speech can be heard?

Continue to the full project readings

Purple Action: when making a case becomes a proposal

Sources and locators

Project materials and attributed sources (Chinese)

Purple Action and the Duel Club (Chinese)

Project introductions for Shen Bolun, He Fa and Shao Yifan (Chinese)

Member introductions and collective attribution, not roles for individual events

Editing and saved editions

Document-reading edit date: 2026-10-08 · Online document reading

Cite this exact edition

4ed084ebdc8b31255bb2c8ecb9f4fd83864b9571ddca5673cfca86d2ad139e61
Cited topic and source editions