Research narrative: evidence limits below
Before one passage, the retained machine notes list a check of the starting point and music, reports of missing and then low sound, and a response allowing continuation. This candidate sequence makes technical collaboration concrete: what is heard becomes a condition for checking again and proceeding. Without audio verification, the notes are not a receipt certifying equipment repair or evidence that sound worked throughout the performance. Starting-point confirmation, feedback and operation are positions in a task, not a count of distinct people or an automatic attribution to a director.
Time and version
Based on machine transcription of non-public recordings; not yet checked against the audio and may misrepresent the process. Dates are not independently confirmed.
Anonymous method study; process sequences remain candidates in retained research, not verified personal attributions.
People and organizational roles
This entry adds no attribution of personal or organizational roles.
Limits of this evidence
- Evidence note: retained research notes and sampled-frame research, without human audio checking. Names, outcomes and exact dates remain unconfirmed; no video time links are generated.
- The recordings have not been continuously watched or audio-checked here; machine text, sampled frames and retrospective accounts support different kinds of claims.
- No new personal roles, implementation outcomes or source-to-public-video timing maps are asserted.
These are reviewed research texts. Related public films identify their access editions separately; local source timings are not converted into web links.
People, groups, documents and plans
Solid: documented. Dashed: inference awaiting verification. Double: conflicting evidence. These relationships record public credits, attributed recollections, retained research and explicit links between research entries; no unverified identities or conflict allegations are added. Connections do not imply causation or implementation.
- Anonymous method analysis from retained research notesResearch-source relationship; no personal attribution or implementation claim
Sources and versions
S59-2 · Four Eyes: transition, sound and spatial coordination notes
日期未独立核定 / Date not independently verified
An edited study of ordinary creative methods, based on retained machine notes and sampled-frame research, without human audio verification. The underlying notes, personal judgments, local paths and source timings are not published here.
Passage locator: Retrying transitions, sound feedback, routes and lit areas; identities and outcomes unverified